The Ayodhya verdict comes after a century-old legitimate wrangle over the land where the 16th century Babri mosque stood some time recently it was bulldozed by Hindu activists who accept it is the origin of Lord Ram. The Supreme Court said that the mosque devastation was an infringement of the law.

What’s the Final Verdict?

  • The “malikana haq” or the proprietorship right of the debated land has gone to the Ramjanmabhoomi Nyas.
  • The 2.77 sections of land of debated land in Ayodhya has gone completely to Hindus, and Muslims will be given an alternative 5 acres of land in Ayodhya to construct a mosque, the Supreme Court has concluded in a consistent judgment.
  • The Sunni Waqf Board will be given 5-acre “reasonable” plot to construct a modern mosque. The judges included that there ought to be resilience and common co-existence for the secular commitment of our country and its people.
  • In 2010, an Allahabad High Court judgment divided the 2.77 sections of land into 3 equal parts.
  • Two parcels went to Hindu parties – the Nirmohi Akhara and Ram Lalla Virajmaan and one portion to the UP Central Sunni Wakf Board. The Hindu parties and the Muslim side challenged this judgment.
  • The court has said the Central Government ought to inside 3 months define a plot to set up a scheme for ownership of the internal and external yards of the debated location.
  • The scheme will have, among others, the Nirmohi Akhara, whose claim to possession of the land has been expelled nowadays.
  • In any case, Hindu petitioners had built up their case that they were in ownership of external courtyard and the Sunni Waqf Board had failed to set up its case, the judges ruled.
  • The five-judge structure bench heard the case for 40 days. The other individuals of the bench are Judges SA Bobde, DY Chandrachud, Ashok Bhushan and S Abdul Nazeer.
  • At the heart of the case was a property debate dealing with 2.77 acres of land. The Supreme Court had to choose who possessed this land. But this piece of real estate has ended up the foremost divisive political weapon in India.
  • There have been appeals for peace and increased security over the nation because of the verdict, which had to be conveyed some time recently before Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi resigns on November 17.